Ben, Back in 1984, I told you I drew the line at Bruce Springsteen; I just couldn't get on with his music. Then Born in the USA came out, and, though it was unfair that it got it lumped in with Rambo and gung-ho Reaganism, that just reinforced how I felt. I said how I couldn't stomach the bombast and the self-importance of Bruce's sound. "Ah," you said, "well you should at least try Nebraska — you can't accuse that of bombast".
In 2000, I finally took you advice and bought it (for a fiver, from Fopp). It's the first and so far the only Springsteen album I've ever owned — though I was quite tempted by the Born to Run Anniversary edition recently, having read that the DVD material is really good.
And you were right, it really is a good album — one that reminds you how album-ish an album can be, since all its songs are of a piece, rather than being a hotch-potch of different themes and moods. There's quite an interesting essay about it by Howard Hampton in The Rose and the Briar, which I read last year. He writes about Nebraska the song in the terms of all the couple-on-the-run-from-the-law films from You Only Live Once to Natural Born Killers, then he goes onto the rest of the album, which he compares in part to Preston Sturges's Sullivan's Travels and also to O Brother Where Art Thou?, the film that Sullivan set out to make in Sullivan's Travels.
My friend David Kay played me a bit of the Badlands Nebraska tribute album in his car a few years ago. It's on my Amazon wishlist.
I actually saw Bruce play live once. I was in Toronto in 1992; it was my last night before returning to the UK, and Bruce was playing one of those enormous arenas. In the spirit of 'When in Rome…' I decided I'd go if they had any tickets left. As luck would have it, they'd just released a final block. The gig was terrible. It had all of the self-importance and strutting that I'd imagined it might have, but none of it was convincing. I think someone told me later that 1992 wasn't his best tour.
|
|
Comments